A cautionary tale on using panel data estimators to measure program impacts
Casey Wichman () and
Paul Ferraro ()
Economics Letters, 2017, vol. 151, issue C, 82-90
We compare experimental and nonexperimental estimates from a social and informational messaging experiment. Our results show that applying a fixed effects estimator in conjunction with matching to pre-process nonexperimental comparison groups cannot replicate an experimental benchmark, despite parallel pre-intervention trends and good covariate balance. The results are a stark reminder about the role of untestable assumptions–in our case, conditional bias stability–in drawing causal inferences from observational data, and the dangers of relying on single studies to justify program scaling-up or canceling.
Keywords: Design replication; Program evaluation; Matching; Panel data; Water conservation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C52 C93 D12 H42 Q25 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ecolet:v:151:y:2017:i:c:p:82-90
Access Statistics for this article
Economics Letters is currently edited by Economics Letters Editorial Office
More articles in Economics Letters from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dana Niculescu ().