Do reputable certifiers of quality exploit their reputations? Evidence from China’s IPO market
Libing Fang and
Economics Letters, 2018, vol. 163, issue C, 72-74
While the theoretical literature predicts that reputable certifiers of quality may exploit their reputations, empirical evidence on reputation exploitation is limited. Using a sample from China’s IPO market, we find that underwriter (certifier) reputation is positively related to issuer earnings quality in cold markets. Consistent with reputation exploitation, this positive relationship disappears in hot markets.
Keywords: Quality certification; Reputation exploitation; IPO market; Underwriter (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D8 L1 G2 D4 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ecolet:v:163:y:2018:i:c:p:72-74
Access Statistics for this article
Economics Letters is currently edited by Economics Letters Editorial Office
More articles in Economics Letters from Elsevier
Series data maintained by Dana Niculescu ().