EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Two further impossibility results on responsive affirmative action in school choice

Zhenhua Jiao and Guoqiang Tian

Economics Letters, 2018, vol. 166, issue C, 60-62

Abstract: This paper investigates the responsiveness of priority-based affirmative action in school choice. We consider two efficiency-improved mechanisms—Kesten’s EADAM (efficiency-adjusted deferred acceptance mechanism) and DA-TTC mechanism (running deferred acceptance and then running top trading cycles algorithm). We show that neither EADAM nor DA-TTC is minimally responsive to the priority-based affirmative action policy. That is, under EADAM or DA-TTC, there are market situations in which a stronger affirmative action policy may result in a Pareto inferior assignment for the minority students.

Keywords: School choice; Affirmative action; Minimal responsiveness (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C70 D61 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165176518300685
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ecolet:v:166:y:2018:i:c:p:60-62

DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2018.02.020

Access Statistics for this article

Economics Letters is currently edited by Economics Letters Editorial Office

More articles in Economics Letters from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:ecolet:v:166:y:2018:i:c:p:60-62