The household fallacy

Roger Farmer and Pawel Zabczyk

Economics Letters, 2018, vol. 169, issue C, 83-86

Abstract: We refer to the idea that government must ‘tighten its belt’ as a necessary policy response to higher indebtedness as the household fallacy. We provide a reason to be skeptical of this claim that holds even if the economy always operates at full employment and all markets clear. Our argument rests on the fact that, in an overlapping-generations (OLG) model, changes in government debt cause changes in the real interest rate that redistribute the burden of repayment across generations. We do not rely on the assumption that the equilibrium is dynamically inefficient, and our argument holds in a version of the OLG model where the real interest rate is always positive.

Keywords: Deficit; Austerity; Government budget (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E0 H62 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165176518301915
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
Working Paper: The Household Fallacy (2018)
Working Paper: The Household Fallacy (2018)
Working Paper: The Household Fallacy (2018)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ecolet:v:169:y:2018:i:c:p:83-86

DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2018.05.018

Access Statistics for this article

Economics Letters is currently edited by Economics Letters Editorial Office

More articles in Economics Letters from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().