 Reconsidering the role of choice and chance for predicting retirement wealthEconomics Letters, 2020, vol. 194, issue C Abstract: Why do many households accumulate substantial wealth by retirement, while many other households accumulate very little? Venti and Wise (1999, 2001) directly examine this question by utilizing data that were superior to that available to previous researchers and conclude that “the bulk of the dispersion must be attributed to differences in the amount that households choose to save.” In this paper, we examine the extent that a remaining problem in their data affected their results: Their measure of lifetime earnings that was used to capture a household’s ability to save, despite being based on administrative data, was subject to topcoding in each year. Using a data set that was not subject to the same problem, we find that the ability to save (measured by lifetime earnings) played a much larger role. Our findings suggest that the correlation between lifetime earnings and savings was about 50 percent greater than what is found when using censored data. Keywords: Savings; Retirement; Measurement error (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ecolet:v:194:y:2020:i:c:s0165176520302408 DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2020.109382 Access Statistics for this article Economics Letters is currently edited by Economics Letters Editorial Office More articles in Economics Letters from Elsevier |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.