EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Does the die-under-the-cup device exaggerate cheating?

Antonio Alfonso-Costillo, Pablo Brañas-Garza () and Ma Carmen López-Martín

Economics Letters, 2022, vol. 214, issue C

Abstract: Using a powered online experiment (774 subjects, 54% female, av. age = 24.27) under the die-under-the-cup paradigm, this paper shows that a minimal variation (reversing payoffs) increases participants’ honesty. Dice numbers and monetary prizes are aligned in the control treatment (1→5€, 2→10€, …, 6→30€), while numbers and monetary prizes go in opposite directions in the reversed treatment (1→30€, 2→25€, …, 6→5€). Although this small variation has no theoretical consequences, it results in more honest behavior. Since the participants in the control and the treatment are identical, we conclude that the observed dishonesty is caused by the task. The effect is stronger for women and older participants.

Keywords: Honesty; Order effects; Reversed payoffs; Die-under-the-cup (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165176522000854
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ecolet:v:214:y:2022:i:c:s0165176522000854

DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2022.110424

Access Statistics for this article

Economics Letters is currently edited by Economics Letters Editorial Office

More articles in Economics Letters from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2022-09-26
Handle: RePEc:eee:ecolet:v:214:y:2022:i:c:s0165176522000854