Fertility subsidies can have ambiguous effects on birth timing

Jesse Naidoo

Economics Letters, 2023, vol. 229, issue C

Abstract: Pronatalist subsidies often vary with birth order (parity). I study the effect of such subsidies on birth timing in a life-cycle model of fertility choice. In the model, births permanently reduce the rate of human capital accumulation. While subsidies to marginal births always accelerate the time to next birth, subsidies to higher-order births can extend those times for women at low parities. The result is not driven by income effects, quantity-quality substitution, biological constraints, or uncertainty. Instead, it is that slower anticipated earnings growth in the future raises the marginal value of human capital in the present.

Keywords: Fertility; Life-cycle; Birth spacing; Human capital (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D15 J13 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165176523002409
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ecolet:v:229:y:2023:i:c:s0165176523002409

DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2023.111215

Access Statistics for this article

Economics Letters is currently edited by Economics Letters Editorial Office

More articles in Economics Letters from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().