Depth of reasoning in the 11–20 game differs between financial professionals and students. A lab-in-the-field experiment

Bernur Açıkgöz, Dimitri Dubois, Adrien Nguyen-Huu, Sébastien Duchêne and Marc Willinger

Economics Letters, 2024, vol. 239, issue C

Abstract: We rely on Alaoui and Penta (2020)’s variant of the 11–20 game (Arad and Rubinstein, 2012), to elicit the depth of reasoning of financial professionals (FP) and students (ST). FP chose lower numbers in the 11–20 game than ST, but had similar CRT scores. We observe that ST with higher CRT scores tend to choose larger numbers. FPs’ chosen numbers are positively affected by their SVO while ST's chosen numbers are positively affected by their risk-aversion.

Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165176524002374
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
Working Paper: Depth of reasoning in the 11-20 game differs between financial professionals and students. A lab-in-the-field experiment (2024)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ecolet:v:239:y:2024:i:c:s0165176524002374

DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2024.111754

Access Statistics for this article

Economics Letters is currently edited by Economics Letters Editorial Office

More articles in Economics Letters from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().