Measuring trust across countries: Inconsistencies between experiments and surveys

Shan Jin, Sibo Yan and Xiaomeng Zhang

Economics Letters, 2025, vol. 248, issue C

Abstract: This study examines whether incentivized experiments and non-incentivized surveys yield consistent cross-country measurements of trust. Drawing on data from Johnson and Mislin (2011) meta-analysis of 151 trust games, recent 71 studies, and Falk et al (2018) Global Preferences Survey, we find notable divergences between these two approaches. To explore these differences, we conducted trust game experiments with and without incentives at universities in China and the United States. In China, the incentive condition led to markedly different outcomes, while in the U.S., differences were relatively small. Moreover, Chinese participants displayed significantly higher levels of trust in non-incentivized settings. These findings underscore that the influence of incentives on trust varies substantially across cultural contexts.

Keywords: Lab experiment; Large survey; Trust; Incentives (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C91 D81 D90 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165176525000503
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ecolet:v:248:y:2025:i:c:s0165176525000503

DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2025.112213

Access Statistics for this article

Economics Letters is currently edited by Economics Letters Editorial Office

More articles in Economics Letters from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().