 A New Statistic for Bayesian Hypothesis TestingSu Chen and Stephen G. Walker Econometrics and Statistics, 2023, vol. 26, issue C, 139-152 Abstract: A new Bayesian–inspired statistic for hypothesis testing is proposed which compares two posterior distributions; the observed posterior and the expected posterior under the null model. The Kullback–Leibler divergence between the two posterior distributions yields a test statistic which can be interpreted as a penalized log–Bayes factor with the penalty term converging to a constant as the sample size increases. Hence, asymptotically, the statistic behaves as a Bayes factor. Viewed as a penalized Bayes factor, this approach solves the long standing issue of using improper priors with the Bayes factor, since only posterior summaries are needed for the new statistic. Further motivation for the new statistic is a minimal move from the Bayes factor which requires no tuning nor splitting of data into training and inference, and can use improper priors. Critical regions for the test can be assessed using frequentist notions of Type I error. Keywords: Hypothesis Testing; Bayes factor; Kullback–Leibler divergence; Improper prior (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ecosta:v:26:y:2023:i:c:p:139-152 DOI: 10.1016/j.ecosta.2021.10.009 Access Statistics for this article Econometrics and Statistics is currently edited by E.J. Kontoghiorghes, H. Van Dijk and A.M. Colubi More articles in Econometrics and Statistics from Elsevier |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.