A micro foundation for discrete choice models with multiple categories of goods
Yukihiro Kidokoro
Journal of choice modelling, 2016, vol. 19, issue C, 54-72
Abstract:
Discrete choice models are well suited to describing consumer choice. However, conventional discrete choice models depart from standard utility maximization models in two important respects. First, in typical discrete choice models, the total demand for a choice set is exogenously fixed. Second, conventional discrete choice models have a limited ability to describe the unrestricted substitutionary or complementary relationships between multiple categories of goods. Both suggest that conventional discrete choice models correspond to a special utility maximization problem that we can develop to incorporate endogenous change in the total demand for a choice set and multiple categories of goods in an unrestrictive way. The purpose of this paper is to clarify the theoretical foundation of such discrete choice models in the context of standard deterministic utility maximization, derive the elasticities of the implied demand functions, and obtain a method for the calculation of welfare change. The framework in this paper is most useful for considering complementary relationships across categories, which is generally intractable in conventional discrete choice models in the absence of restrictive assumptions. The analysis demonstrates that the results of discrete choice models are perfectly consistent with standard deterministic utility maximization, even if the total demand for a choice set changes endogenously or with multiple categories of goods. Thus, discrete choice models are intrinsically more applicable across a much broader range of consumer choices.
Keywords: Discrete choice; Multiple categories; Product differentiation; Logit; GEV (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755534515301135
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:eejocm:v:19:y:2016:i:c:p:54-72
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocm.2016.07.002
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of choice modelling is currently edited by S. Hess and J.M. Rose
More articles in Journal of choice modelling from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().