An analysis of forward exchange rate biasedness across developed and developing country currencies: Do observed patterns persist out of sample?
Grace Loring and
Brian Lucey
Emerging Markets Review, 2013, vol. 17, issue C, 14-28
Abstract:
Forward exchange rate unbiasedness hypothesis (FRUH) has been a widely researched subject for decades. Recently, the sample populations of these studies have expanded to include developing country currencies. The majority of these findings have been that forward rate biasedness is more pronounced for developed country currencies than it is for developing country currencies. One such paper (Frankel and Poonawala, 2010) has further suggested that this phenomenon may contradict Risk Premium Theory since developing country currencies are relatively more volatile. Our analysis first replicates the results of Frankel and Poonawala and then extends the study out of sample using an updated composition of currency classifications. The results of this extended period of analysis show that forward rate biasedness is less pronounced for developed country currencies than for developing country currencies and consequently does not establish grounds to challenge Risk Premium Theory. Furthermore, our results are consistent with another branch of literature which suggests that conflicting FRUH test results may be particular to the time period examined. It is therefore possible to speculate that period-specific factors were responsible for the results found in previous research.
Keywords: Forward rate unbiasedness; Emerging markets; Foreign exchange (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: F31 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (12)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1566014113000496
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ememar:v:17:y:2013:i:c:p:14-28
DOI: 10.1016/j.ememar.2013.07.001
Access Statistics for this article
Emerging Markets Review is currently edited by Jonathan A. Batten
More articles in Emerging Markets Review from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().