Rating standards around the world: A puzzle?
Hamdi Driss and
Sadok El Ghoul
Emerging Markets Review, 2020, vol. 45, issue C
Using panel data on S&P's credit ratings for firms from 63 countries over the 2000–2016 period, we uncover divergent patterns in the rating standards over time. Standards strengthen by 1.5 notches for U.S. firms and by 2.2 notches for other developed country firms, but weaken by 1.2 notches for emerging country firms. Default and credit spread tests show that standards tightening for U.S. and other developed country firms is likely unwarranted, whereas standards loosening for firms in emerging economies appears to be justified. This novel and puzzling evidence suggests that S&P does not adopt consistent global standards over time.
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ememar:v:45:y:2020:i:c:s1566014119305618
Access Statistics for this article
Emerging Markets Review is currently edited by Jonathan A. Batten
More articles in Emerging Markets Review from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().