Inter-regional coal mine competition in the US: Evidence from rail restrictions
Kanishka Kacker () and
Energy Economics, 2022, vol. 110, issue C
This analysis looks at how Appalachian coal mining responds to restrictions in coal production from the Western US. An unexpected reduction in the ability to move coal from the Powder River Basin (PRB) in 2005–06 led to a reduction in the rate of Appalachian coal mine closure, no impact on the rate of coal mine openings, and an increase in the number of employees in Appalachian coal mines. On the demand side, plants in the Midwest are more likely to switch from PRB coal to Appalachian coal, using the spot market to procure this coal, which is costlier and of lower quality. The results imply inter-regional coal mine substitution possibilities and shed light on the tradeoffs inherent in policies that impact production in one region.
Keywords: Coal switching; Railroads; Supply shock; Input substitution (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: L71 Q35 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Working Paper: Inter-Regional Coal Mine Competition in the US: Evidence from Rail Restrictions (2018)
Working Paper: Inter-Regional Coal Mine Competition in the US: Evidence from Rail Restriction (2017)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:110:y:2022:i:c:s0140988322001700
Access Statistics for this article
Energy Economics is currently edited by R. S. J. Tol, Beng Ang, Lance Bachmeier, Perry Sadorsky, Ugur Soytas and J. P. Weyant
More articles in Energy Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().