 Who's afraid of a Texas hedge?Gabriel J. Power and Dmitry Vedenov Energy Economics, 2023, vol. 127, issue PB Abstract: There is anecdotal evidence of hedgers taking speculative positions using futures contracts—so-called “Texas hedges”—but the literature provides little guidance on this phenomenon. The paper explores the conditions under which “Texas hedges” may be optimal within the standard risk management framework. Using an empirical setting of multi-commodity hedging, we find that (1) “Texas hedges” do not occur when hedges are optimized individually (single-commodity hedging), (2) neither do they occur when the hedger's objective is to minimize variance, but (3) they do occur 18% of the time in a multi-commodity framework under a downside risk minimization objective (i.e., LPM2), which is closer to what hedgers actually do. Furthermore, (4) “Texas hedges” arise following periods of strong price momentum. This can be explained by downside risk-averse hedgers being concerned only about one side of the distribution. Therefore, expected favorable price movements are not treated as risk, but rather as a profit-enhancing opportunity. Keywords: Texas hedge; Speculation; Multi-commodity; Hedging; Downside risk; Copula; Crack spread; Momentum (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:127:y:2023:i:pb:s0140988323005674 DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2023.107069 Access Statistics for this article Energy Economics is currently edited by R. S. J. Tol, Beng Ang, Lance Bachmeier, Perry Sadorsky, Ugur Soytas and J. P. Weyant More articles in Energy Economics from Elsevier |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.