EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Inverse product differentiation logit model: Holy grail or not?

Jinghai Huo, Rubal Dua and Prateek Bansal

Energy Economics, 2024, vol. 131, issue C

Abstract: Random coefficient logit (RCL) is the workhorse model to estimate demand elasticities in markets with differentiated products using aggregated sales data. While the ability to represent flexible substitution patterns makes RCL preferable, its estimation is computationally challenging due to the numerical inversion of the demand function. The recently proposed inverse product differentiation logit (IPDL) addresses this computational issue by directly specifying the inverse demand function. In addition to computational gains, IPDL claims to maintain flexibility through non-hierarchical product segmentation across multiple characteristics. Thus, IPDL is an attractive alternative to RCL in theory, but its potential remains unexplored in empirical studies. We present the first application of IPDL in understanding the demand for passenger cars in China using province-level sales data. Our results show that IPDL is around 300 times faster than RCL, can capture complementarity patterns that cannot be captured by RCL, can identify substitution patterns as well as RCL, and outperforms RCL in goodness of fit measures.

Keywords: Market demand; Random-coefficient logit; Substitution patterns; Inverse demand function; Computational efficiency (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988324000872
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:131:y:2024:i:c:s0140988324000872

DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107379

Access Statistics for this article

Energy Economics is currently edited by R. S. J. Tol, Beng Ang, Lance Bachmeier, Perry Sadorsky, Ugur Soytas and J. P. Weyant

More articles in Energy Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:131:y:2024:i:c:s0140988324000872