The effects of conventional and unconventional monetary policies of the US, EU, and China on global green investment

Saira Tufail, Shahzad Alvi, Viet-Ngu Hoang and Clevo Wilson

Energy Economics, 2024, vol. 134, issue C

Abstract: This study investigates how the monetary policies of the USA, EU, and China affect global green investment differently by using the dynamic autoregressive distributive lag (DARDL) model and kernel-based regularized least squares (KRLS). DARDL's results show that US monetary policy is not conducive to global green investment in the short and long term. The EU's conventional monetary policy negatively impacts global green investment, but only in the short term. However, China's conventional monetary policy boosts global green investment in the long term. The inference from the response simulations implies that the conventional monetary easing policy of the US, EU, and China positively influences global green investment in the long and short run. However, the magnitude of the response of the EU is greater than that of the US and China. Unconventional monetary policy easing of the US negatively influences global green investments in the short run, whereas China and EU policies affect it positively. However, in the long run, global green investment is unaffected by unconventional monetary policy easing in the case of the US. In contrast, China's and the EU's unconventional monetary policies easing have had a positive impact. In the case of financial development, a negative impact on global green investment is more strongly evident for China than for the US and the EU. Overall, the empirical results of this study recommend that a significant change in the monetary policies of large economies is required to promote global green investment for ecological transition.

Keywords: Conventional monetary policies; Unconventional monetary policies; Green bonds investment; Dynamic autoregressive distributive lag model; Kernel-based regularized least squares (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988324002573
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:134:y:2024:i:c:s0140988324002573

DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107549

Access Statistics for this article

Energy Economics is currently edited by R. S. J. Tol, Beng Ang, Lance Bachmeier, Perry Sadorsky, Ugur Soytas and J. P. Weyant

More articles in Energy Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().