 Inferring local social cost from renewable zoning decisions. Evidence from Lower Austria’s wind power zoningSebastian Wehrle, Peter Regner, Ulrich B. Morawetz and Johannes Schmidt Energy Economics, 2024, vol. 139, issue C Abstract: Large infrastructures, such as wind turbines, may adversely affect their environment, so their deployment is often regulated. These regulations are frequently based on a dichotomy between areas considered feasible or infeasible areas for infrastructure deployment. To overcome the inability of such a binary distinction to adequately represent the involved economic trade-offs between, but also within feasible and infeasible areas, we establish a discrete choice framework to elicit social preferences implicit in Lower Austria’s wind power zoning and generate comprehensive estimates of local social costs in high spatial resolution. Our findings suggest that wind turbines were attributed significant local social costs in the political zoning process. These local social cost estimates can inform siting decisions, improve power system modelling and open a novel perspective on the assessment of potentials for renewable energies. Keywords: Externalities; Wind power; Renewable energy; Power system design; Policy (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:139:y:2024:i:c:s0140988324005735 DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107865 Access Statistics for this article Energy Economics is currently edited by R. S. J. Tol, Beng Ang, Lance Bachmeier, Perry Sadorsky, Ugur Soytas and J. P. Weyant More articles in Energy Economics from Elsevier |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.