 Inflation, inequality and financial vulnerability: Monetary vs. fiscal policy in the face of an energy shockSamantha Coccia and Alberto Russo Energy Economics, 2025, vol. 143, issue C Abstract: The energy shock caused by the conflict in Ukraine has exacerbated inflation, prompting central banks to respond by raising interest rates. This study uses an agent-based stock-flow consistent (AB-SFC) model to assess the impact of energy shocks, as well as monetary and fiscal policy, on inflation, inequality, and household financial vulnerability. The results show that energy shocks increase nominal spending for households and non-financial firms, leading to higher inflation, unemployment, inequality, household indebtedness and financial vulnerability. Furthermore, while monetary policy is effective in reducing inflation, it does so at the cost of exacerbating inequality and household financial vulnerability. In contrast, fiscal measures, such as energy price caps, can reduce inflation without exacerbating the economic crisis caused by the energy shock; indeed, compared to the monetary approach, fiscal policy reduces inflation and inequality and also improves household financial stability. Keywords: Energy shock; Monetary policy; Fiscal policy; Inequality; Agent-based model (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:143:y:2025:i:c:s0140988325000453 DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108222 Access Statistics for this article Energy Economics is currently edited by R. S. J. Tol, Beng Ang, Lance Bachmeier, Perry Sadorsky, Ugur Soytas and J. P. Weyant More articles in Energy Economics from Elsevier |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.