Cross-media pollution and fuels -- Can we avoid future MTBEs?

Linda Fernandez and Christopher F. Dumas

Energy Economics, 2009, vol. 31, issue 3, 423-430

Abstract: Recent experience with the gasoline additive MTBE shows that regulations intended to improve environmental quality in one medium (e.g., air) may lead to unintended, and more serious, environmental consequences in another (e.g., water). The "cross-media pollution problem" refers to the unintended impacts in one environmental medium of environmental regulations implemented in another. We examine the potential for mechanism design to help regulators avoid unintended consequences of cross-media pollution in situations involving uncertain cross-media damages and asymmetric liability information between regulators and firms. In an empirical example, we consider the case of MTBE gasoline additive regulation in California.

Keywords: Cross-media; pollution; MTBE; Incentive; mechanism; design; Liability (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140-9883(09)00008-5
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:31:y:2009:i:3:p:423-430

Access Statistics for this article

Energy Economics is currently edited by R. S. J. Tol, Beng Ang, Lance Bachmeier, Perry Sadorsky, Ugur Soytas and J. P. Weyant

More articles in Energy Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().