Using the competitive storage model to estimate the impact of ethanol and fueling investment on corn prices

Wei Zhou and Bruce Babcock

Energy Economics, 2017, vol. 62, issue C, 195-203

Abstract: The impact of biofuel mandates on the prices of commodities used to produce food continues to be a major consideration by policy makers. More recently concern about high compliance costs of oil companies due to mandates led to reductions in US biofuel mandates. To gain insights into the policy impacts of mandates on agricultural commodity prices and compliance costs requires development of dynamic models that can capture the fact that many agricultural commodities used to produce biofuels can be stored and that flexible compliance mechanisms allow for banking and borrowing of tradable permits. US biofuel mandates are enforced using a system of tradable permits, called RINs. RIN market dynamics are important because RINs can be banked for the future or borrowed from the future. Corn is the primary U.S. biofuel feedstock and is storable. Rational expectations competitive storage models are well suited to capture the dynamic behavior of commodity markets. Such a model is developed here for corn and RIN markets to estimate the impacts of alternative future ethanol mandate levels. The model considers corn use for ethanol, storage and all other uses in each period, accounting for two random variables: oil prices and corn yields. Borrowing and banking provisions of the Renewable Fuels Standard mandate are explicitly integrated into the model. We use the model to provide estimates of the impact on corn prices, corn plantings and ethanol production under two ethanol mandate scenarios for six marketing years from 2016/17. Our scenarios are a combination of volume requirements and infrastructure investment. The first scenario is one in which corn ethanol mandates stay the same as required in the current and proposed RFS and additional E85 stations are introduced that allow for compliance with higher mandates. The second scenario is one in which no investment occurs and the Environmental Protection Agency reduces the mandate to 13.87billiongal, a level that can just be met with 10 percent ethanol blends. Comparing the results for two scenarios, we find that average corn prices are about 5 to 6% lower with the reduced mandates or about 22 to 30 cents per bushel, while average RIN prices drop from around 60 to 40 cents per RIN.

Keywords: Ethanol mandate; Corn prices; RIN prices; Competitive storage model; Collocation method (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q11 Q48 Q58 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014098831730004X
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:62:y:2017:i:c:p:195-203

DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2016.12.017

Access Statistics for this article

Energy Economics is currently edited by R. S. J. Tol, Beng Ang, Lance Bachmeier, Perry Sadorsky, Ugur Soytas and J. P. Weyant

More articles in Energy Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().