EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Pure martingale and joint normality tests for energy futures contracts

Keshab Shrestha, Ravichandran Subramaniam and Puspavathy Rassiah

Energy Economics, 2017, vol. 63, issue C, 174-184

Abstract: In this study, we empirically analyze to see if the pure martingale hypothesis holds for three energy-related commodities: crude oil, heating oil and natural gas. We also test this hypothesis for five different hedging horizons: 1-day, 1-week, 4-week, 8-week and 12-week. Our empirical results show that the pure martingale hypothesis holds for all three commodities and all five horizons. This implies that the expected return on futures contract can be ignored in determining the optimal hedge ratio. We also test to see if the joint normality between futures and spot returns holds for the same three commodities and five hedging horizons. We reject the joint normality hypothesis for all three commodities and five hedging horizons. This implies that hedgers with different utility function have different optimal hedge ratios. Thus, in general, one needs to take into account of hedger's utility function when deriving optimal hedge ratio. Our results are robust to pre- and post-financial crisis as well as some other specifications considered in the paper.

Keywords: Hedge ratio; Pure martingale; Joint normality (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C3 G1 Q4 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988317300439
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:63:y:2017:i:c:p:174-184

Access Statistics for this article

Energy Economics is currently edited by R. S. J. Tol, Beng Ang, Lance Bachmeier, Perry Sadorsky, Ugur Soytas and J. P. Weyant

More articles in Energy Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dana Niculescu ().

 
Page updated 2018-06-02
Handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:63:y:2017:i:c:p:174-184