EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Understanding the motivations behind the Myanmar-China energy pipeline: Multiple streams and energy politics in China

Dawei Liu, Kensuke Yamaguchi and Hisashi Yoshikawa

Energy Policy, 2017, vol. 107, issue C, 403-412

Abstract: Why exactly did China decide to construct the Myanmar-China energy pipeline? While important for China's long-term energy strategy, very few studies have yet analyzed the project from the standpoint of China's domestic policy process. This paper fills the gap by illuminating the broader historical context and presenting how this pipeline fits into energy politics in China. The policy-making process is fleshed out by using the multiple streams framework (MSF). Analysis of this case using MSF shows that, first, local governments and scholars played a key role in facilitating the project, especially in raising the proposal to the government agenda. Second, a “policy window” remains an important element in China's energy policy decisions, in light of the China-Myanmar pipeline idea was not taken seriously in the 1990s when it was first proposed. Third, although this cross-border energy project is part of a national strategy of energy security, domestic political considerations such as promoting investment in China's underdeveloped southwest were also at work. These conclusions are useful for understanding not only the motivations behind such transboundary pipeline projects but also China's energy decisions at large.

Keywords: Myanmar-China energy pipeline; Multiple streams framework; Energy politics (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421517302896
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:enepol:v:107:y:2017:i:c:p:403-412

DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.05.005

Access Statistics for this article

Energy Policy is currently edited by N. France

More articles in Energy Policy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:107:y:2017:i:c:p:403-412