EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Garbage can theory and Australia's National Electricity Market: Decarbonisation in a hostile policy environment

Paul Simshauser ()

Energy Policy, 2018, vol. 120, issue C, 697-713

Abstract: After two decades of consistent economic and technical performance, conditions in Australia's National Electricity Market (NEM) deteriorated sharply in 2016/17. Prices more than doubled on the east coast, tripled in South Australia (SA), and the SA regional grid collapsed. Nothing spectacular occurred with final demand – this was a supply-side energy crisis driven by the exit of 18% of Australia's coal-fired generation fleet and the inadequate entry of new plant. Australia's NEM encountered an uncoordinated exit-driven episode of the Resource Adequacy problem. In the USA where 18% of coal plant has also exited, Resource Adequacy and low cost energy has been maintained by the entry of an enormous fleet of wind, solar and gas-fired generators. In Australia, an equivalent response did not occur; decades of climate change policy discontinuity meant the speed of coal plant exit was unpredictable, entry of renewables delayed through stop-start policy, and gas-fired plant was subject to critical hold-up due to excess LNG plant investment. Resolution requires a united and stable climate change policy architecture that works with, not against, the NEM's world-class institutional design, and greater transparency around planned plant exit.

Keywords: Resource Adequacy; Climate change policy; Garbage can theory (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421518303860
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:enepol:v:120:y:2018:i:c:p:697-713

Access Statistics for this article

Energy Policy is currently edited by N. France

More articles in Energy Policy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dana Niculescu ().

 
Page updated 2019-06-20
Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:120:y:2018:i:c:p:697-713