 An empirical analysis of energy intensity and the role of policy instrumentsDina Azhgaliyeva, Yang Liu and Brantley Liddle Energy Policy, 2020, vol. 145, issue C Abstract: The reduction of energy intensity is important for sustainable economic growth, especially in non-OECD countries where energy demand growth is high. Understanding the impact of policies on energy intensity can help policy-makers to reduce energy intensity. Using empirical methods and cross-country data from 44 countries over the period 1990–2016, we study the determinants of energy intensity. The common correlated effects mean group estimator is employed since it addresses nonstationarity, cross-sectional dependence, and heterogeneity—all three of which exist in the data. Both GDP per capita and economy-wide energy prices are shown to be negatively associated with energy intensity. The empirical results provide evidence that several policy instruments are effective in reducing energy intensity: (i) standards, and labeling; (ii) government direct investment; (iii) strategic planning and support; (iv) fiscal measures/taxes; and (v) grants and subsidies. The duration of the policy is more important than the mere existence of the policy in demonstrating the policy's effectiveness. Keywords: Energy intensity; Energy efficiency; Energy policy; Non-OECD countries; Common correlated effects mean group estimator (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:enepol:v:145:y:2020:i:c:s030142152030495x DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111773 Access Statistics for this article Energy Policy is currently edited by N. France More articles in Energy Policy from Elsevier |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.