Optimal building retrofit pathways considering stock dynamics and climate change impacts
Kai Nino Streicher,
Matthias Berger,
Evangelos Panos,
Kapil Narula,
Martin Christoph Soini and
Martin K. Patel
Energy Policy, 2021, vol. 152, issue C
Abstract:
Deep energy retrofit across the European building stock would require decades during which boundary conditions will change. This study identifies a range of retrofit pathways, using a dynamic stock model, a bottom-up energy model and an optimization model for different climate scenarios. We consider 1.1 million different retrofit options in the Swiss residential building stock for different economic/environmental objectives until 2060. Despite the replacement of old by new buildings, energy demand and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the reference scenario without deep energy retrofitting are likely to decrease by only about 25%, while accounting for investments of 2–3 billion CHF/a. Partial energy retrofitting or an investment-minimized pathway are neither cost-effective nor sufficient to get close to the net zero targets. In contrast, the highest GHG-saving pathway leads to very high emission reduction of 90%, but requires investment cost of 9 billion CHF/a, which leads to specific cost of 180 CHF/t CO2eq. The cost-optimal pathway shows moderate trade-offs for investment cost and could reach GHG savings of 77% with specific cost of −140 CHF/t CO2eq. Hence, early and deep energy retrofit is cost-effective and allows deep GHG emission reductions by making full use of the synergies between GHG and cost savings.
Keywords: Deep energy retrofit pathways; Energy efficiency; Dynamic building stock model; Indicator-based optimization; Climate change scenarios (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421521000896
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:enepol:v:152:y:2021:i:c:s0301421521000896
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112220
Access Statistics for this article
Energy Policy is currently edited by N. France
More articles in Energy Policy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().