Impact of sulfur dioxide emissions trading pilot scheme on pollution emissions intensity: A study based on the synthetic control method
Jiandong Chen,
Shasha Huang,
Zhiyang Shen,
Malin Song and
Zunhong Zhu
Energy Policy, 2022, vol. 161, issue C
Abstract:
Emissions trading is presumed to be one of the several effective means to solve the externality of environmental pollution in enterprises. However, previous studies hold varying opinions on the effectiveness of China's sulfur dioxide emissions trading pilot scheme (SETPS). Based on the panel data from 30 provinces in China from 2000 to 2015, the present study uses the synthetic control method to evaluate the impact of the SETPS on the intensity of industrial sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions in the pilot areas. This can avoid problems in the terms of selection bias and policy endogeneity. We find that the effect of the SETPS has regional heterogeneity; Tianjin's emissions trading scheme has achieved the desired reduction effect, whereas the implementation of the SETPS in other areas did not reduce the intensity of industrial SO2 emissions. The robustness test results support the aforementioned conclusions. This study proposes that policy support is necessary for reducing the regional SO2 emissions and that these policies should be constantly adjusted during their implementation. Tianjin's sulfur dioxide pilot needs to be studied in detail and promoted in other regions.
Keywords: Synthetic control method; Sulfur dioxide emissions; Policy evaluation; Sulfur dioxide emissions trading pilot scheme (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (10)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421521005966
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:enepol:v:161:y:2022:i:c:s0301421521005966
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112730
Access Statistics for this article
Energy Policy is currently edited by N. France
More articles in Energy Policy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().