Fighting the wrong battle? A critical assessment of arguments against nodal electricity prices in the European debate
Anselm Eicke and
Energy Policy, 2022, vol. 170, issue C
Contrary to liberalized U.S. electricity markets that apply nodal pricing, European power markets rely on uniform pricing within bidding zones. Europe's zonal pricing model is challenged by an increasing mismatch between network and generation expansion within bidding zones, as well as the complexity of adequately redefining the existing bidding zone configuration. A potential solution is to transition to nodal pricing. The academic literature provides strong evidence of significant cost savings from such a transition. The question is: Why has nodal pricing persistently been discarded in Europe? It cannot be denied that implementing nodal pricing would require significant changes to the European market design. However, the debate in Europe has mostly focused on perceived flaws of the concept of nodal pricing. In this paper, we identify the main arguments against the concept of nodal pricing brought forward by European stakeholders. We group the arguments into the six categories: susceptibility to market power, barriers to unlock flexibility, market liquidity concerns, increased investment risks, unmanageable complexity, and political undesirability of locational price differentiation. Our contribution is to critically assess each of the arguments. We demonstrate that they do not explain, nor justify, the opposition to nodal pricing.
Keywords: Nodal electricity market; Zonal electricity market; US electricity Market; European electricity market (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:enepol:v:170:y:2022:i:c:s0301421522004396
Access Statistics for this article
Energy Policy is currently edited by N. France
More articles in Energy Policy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().