Defueling the impasse: EU political discourse on e-fuels

T. Birel, G.E. Breeman, A. van Buitenen and M.G. Vijver

Energy Policy, 2024, vol. 187, issue C

Abstract: As part of its ‘Fit for 55’ package, the European Commission proposed to ban internal combustion engines in new cars and vans from 2035 onwards. Although initially agreed upon by the Parliament and Council of Ministers, Germany rejected the law last-minute due to its exclusion of e-fuels, leading to a three-week long impasse until a compromise was found. This study aims to explain how this impasse could occur by analysing the political discourse on e-fuels. A qualitative, inductive framing analysis is applied to 77 communications published by 15 stakeholders at five key dates during the legislative procedure. This revealed the different usage of positional and argumentative frames among stakeholders, and the importance of adding the e-fuels recital 9a to the Council’s General Approach. Both a change of mood in the discourse and discrepancies in interpretations of the recital were identified in the stakeholder communications after the Council’s General Approach, signalling towards a potential impasse. Although recitals are commonly used in EU policy making to find compromises, the recital made negotiations more difficult in this case. Understanding how this impasse could occur so suddenly at the end of the procedure can aid in predicting and preventing similar conflicts in the future.

Keywords: Framing analysis; Legislative stalemate; Recital; CO2 emission standards; Fit for 55 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421524000429
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:enepol:v:187:y:2024:i:c:s0301421524000429

DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114022

Access Statistics for this article

Energy Policy is currently edited by N. France

More articles in Energy Policy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().