Can a mandate be justified by unrealized gains? Evidence from a heating energy transition program in China
Chenxi Xiang,
Lunyu Xie and
Xinye Zheng
Energy Policy, 2024, vol. 188, issue C
Abstract:
Mandatory policies are usually motivated by the desire to correct consumer bias caused by imperfect information or inattention to benefits or costs. However, for consumers whose choices already reflect their true preferences, such policies can lead to a utility loss. Therefore, the policy effects deserve closer scrutiny. Using a large-scale household survey and a choice experiment, this study estimates the welfare effects of a mandatory energy transition program in northern China. Through a discrete choice model, we identify the effect of the mandate on household participation in the transition and simulate the welfare change caused by the mandate. We find that the mandate was not always justified by the unrealized health gains; it may have improved social welfare but at the expense of utility loss for some households, especially for lower-income ones and those in areas with higher transition costs and stricter mandates. These findings shed light on ways to improve the distributional welfare effect when a mandate is adopted, for example, by differentiating policy implementation across income groups and considering both efficiency and equity issues in the long run.
Keywords: Consumer bias; Energy transition; Mandate; Social welfare; Utility (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D12 D60 Q48 R28 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421524001174
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:enepol:v:188:y:2024:i:c:s0301421524001174
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114097
Access Statistics for this article
Energy Policy is currently edited by N. France
More articles in Energy Policy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().