To what extent can flexibility options reduce the need for hydrogen backup power plants?

Christoph Brunner, Steffi Misconel, Philipp Hauser and Dominik Möst

Energy Policy, 2025, vol. 201, issue C

Abstract: Achieving a carbon-neutral power system based on renewable energy sources is a critical step toward net-zero emissions before 2050. However, weather-dependent variability of renewable energy generation necessitates various flexibility options to balance supply and demand. In addition to storage, demand-side flexibility from sector coupling (e.g., electrification of heating, transport, and industry) plays a significant role. Yet, the need for supply-side flexibility, particularly through dispatchable hydrogen power plants, remains unclear. In this context, the article addresses the following research question: How much firm capacity from hydrogen power plants is needed to ensure security of supply in a 100% renewable power system? Using a case study for Germany based on an electricity market model-based approach, this paper analyses the impact of different flexibility options on the capacity needs of hydrogen power plants. The results indicate that at least 46 GW of hydrogen power plants are required in a scenario with strong sector coupling and demand-side flexibility. A lack of flexibility options could substantially increase this capacity requirement. The analysis concludes with the policy recommendation that Germany’s current power plant strategy is only an initial step, and more substantial market incentives are essential to ensure adequate firm capacity in a carbon-neutral energy system.

Keywords: Hydrogen; Flexibility; Backup capacity; Sector coupling; Carbon neutrality (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421525000588
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:enepol:v:201:y:2025:i:c:s0301421525000588

DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114551

Access Statistics for this article

Energy Policy is currently edited by N. France

More articles in Energy Policy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().