 The winds of change? Attitudes toward wind projects and their electoral implications in TexasTalbot M. Andrews, Carol Atkinson-Palombo, Oksan Bayulgen, Adam Gallaher and Lyle Scruggs Energy Policy, 2025, vol. 202, issue C Abstract: Wind power is increasingly cost-competitive, but there are growing concerns that partisan backlash will limit the rapid adoption of this low-carbon energy source. When evaluating wind projects, do voters consider the local costs and benefits of turbine construction? Or do their opinions reflect elite polarization on the issue? To answer these questions, we turn to the case of Texas: A state at the forefront of both wind project viability and elite polarization over the issue of wind power development. Surveying everyday Texans reveals that public opinion about wind power is driven primarily by considerations of local costs and benefits and is on average positive. These opinions affect vote choice: Turning to electoral outcomes from 2012 to 2022, turbine construction increased state legislative incumbent vote share. Despite increasing partisan differences on the topic of renewable energy, voters, on average, evaluate local costs and benefits and do not punish incumbent state legislators after local projects are constructed. Keywords: Wind power; Public opinion; Experiments; Elections (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:enepol:v:202:y:2025:i:c:s0301421525001156 DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114608 Access Statistics for this article Energy Policy is currently edited by N. France More articles in Energy Policy from Elsevier |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.