Exxon is right: Let us re-examine our choice for a cap-and-trade system over a carbon tax

Bettina B.F. Wittneben

Energy Policy, 2009, vol. 37, issue 6, 2462-2464

Abstract: This commentary examines the impact of the recently launched European Union Emission Trading System (EU ETS) in terms of emission reductions and cost to the public. The study points out that a cap-and-trade system may not be the most cost-efficient mechanism to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. It also lists seven main differences between such a system and a carbon tax along the following issues: amount of emissions reduced; flow of revenue to the public purse; cost of the system to the public; marginal cost of carbon emission reductions to the firm; generating excess rent; price setting mechanism and stability of system; as well as duration and commitment. When looking at emission reductions along these dimensions, it becomes clear that an internationally coordinated carbon tax may be a quicker and cheaper way to reduce greenhouse gas emissions worldwide.

Keywords: Climate; change; mitigation; Exxon; Carbon; tax (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (29)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301-4215(09)00054-8
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:enepol:v:37:y:2009:i:6:p:2462-2464

Access Statistics for this article

Energy Policy is currently edited by N. France

More articles in Energy Policy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().