‘Tall and lithe’–The wage-height premium in the Victorian and Edwardian British railway industry
Peter Anderson
Explorations in Economic History, 2018, vol. 67, issue C, 152-162
Abstract:
Studies in anthropometrics continue to find a wage-height premium in modern economies despite most productivity not contingent on physical strength. These authors argue that height is a proxy for cognitive and non-cognitive abilities, which earns the positive return. In this paper, I collected data on over 2,200 English and Welsh railwaymen from staff ledgers to test if the same relationship held during the Victorian and Edwardian period. Using an OLS model, it is found that a wage-height premium existed. Applying the same model to different subgroups of railwaymen, it was found that the premium only accrued to taller men working in skilled grades that required a higher cognitive and non-cognitive skill to strength ratio. No such premium existed in the physically taxing entry-level railway grades. A probit regression finds that taller Great Western signalmen working in Wales did not have a lower probability of receiving a fine upon committing an infraction; a finding that contradicts heightism as an explanation of the wage-height premium. I conclude that taller railwaymen benefited because height indirectly measured their cognitive and non-cognitive abilities, not their strength.
Keywords: British railway industry; Railwaymen; Internal labour markets; Wage-height premium; Anthropometric history; Cognitive ability; Non-cognitive ability; Heightism (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014498317300955
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:exehis:v:67:y:2018:i:c:p:152-162
DOI: 10.1016/j.eeh.2017.12.001
Access Statistics for this article
Explorations in Economic History is currently edited by R.H. Steckel
More articles in Explorations in Economic History from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().