EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Does ESG rating disagreement affect management tone manipulation?

Hua Chen and Zhuang Wang

International Review of Financial Analysis, 2025, vol. 101, issue C

Abstract: Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) ratings play a pivotal role in bridging listed companies with the capital market. However, significant discrepancies exist among rating agencies' assessments of a company's ESG performance, making it challenging for the market to evaluate a firm's sustainable development capabilities accurately. This causes confusion among investors and increases the pressure on corporate management. Based on ratings data for Chinese A-share listed companies from 2015 to 2022, we empirically examine the impact and underlying mechanism of ESG rating disagreement on management tone manipulation. The study finds that: (1) ESG rating disagreement significantly intensifies the degree of management tone manipulation; (2) ESG rating disagreement increases the market pressure on managers, thus motivating them to intensify the degree of tone manipulation, while the noise effect of ESG rating disagreement provides an opportunity for managers to intensify tone manipulation; and (3) under ESG rating disagreement, management tone manipulation significantly increases the risk of stock price crashes for listed companies. The conclusions of this study have significant practical implications for regulators in standardizing ESG rating criteria and information disclosure by listed companies.

Keywords: ESG rating disagreement; Management tone manipulation; Capital market pressure; Sustainable development; Corporate governance (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521925001267
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:finana:v:101:y:2025:i:c:s1057521925001267

DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104039

Access Statistics for this article

International Review of Financial Analysis is currently edited by B.M. Lucey

More articles in International Review of Financial Analysis from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-24
Handle: RePEc:eee:finana:v:101:y:2025:i:c:s1057521925001267