How active is your (nominally) actively managed quantitative fund?

António F. Miguel and Yihao Chen

International Review of Financial Analysis, 2025, vol. 103, issue C

Abstract: We study the Active Share (AS) of quantitative actively managed US equity funds (quants). Our results suggest that closet indexing is a common practice among these funds, with 50 % of the assets in quants managed by closet indexers by the end of 2019. This fraction significantly exceeds that observed among human–managed funds (non–quants). Our analysis indicates that AS is associated with lower performance for quants, in contrast to the positive relationship observed for non–quants. We incorporate Tracking Error (TE) alongside AS to further categorize funds based on their level of active management. We find that, after fees, quants tend to underperform their benchmarks across all categories. This result is particularly pronounced among stock pickers, with quants notably trailing non–quants, and for factor bets, which emerge as the poorest performing category. Our findings also challenge the common belief that quants charge lower fees. Although this is generally true for strategies characterized by low AS, it does not hold for those with high AS. Overall, our work documents the prevalence of closet indexing among quants and suggests that significant progress is needed before algorithms can effectively substitute human expertise in strategies that require extensive discretionary decision–making.

Keywords: Quantitative analysis; Active share; Portfolio selection; Performance; Fees; Mutual fund industry (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G11 G23 G40 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521925002601
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:finana:v:103:y:2025:i:c:s1057521925002601

DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104173

Access Statistics for this article

International Review of Financial Analysis is currently edited by B.M. Lucey

More articles in International Review of Financial Analysis from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().