Chasing ESG performance: How methodologies shape outcomes
Matteo Benuzzi,
Karoline Bax,
Sandra Paterlini and
Emanuele Taufer
International Review of Financial Analysis, 2025, vol. 104, issue PA
Abstract:
ESG metrics play a crucial role in sustainable finance but face growing criticism for their inability to accurately capture actual sustainability improvements. This study investigates how methodological choices can introduce distortions in ESG scores, with a primary focus on Refinitiv ESG data, while offering insights applicable to other providers as well. We show that data aggregation and score normalization through percentile ranking significantly impact the ability to reflect genuine sustainability progress. Specifically, the inclusion of new, smaller in size entrants with more missing data can artificially inflate the scores of top-ranked companies, obscuring actual sustainability improvements in the underlying metrics by relying on peer comparisons. Moreover, our analysis reveals that once companies achieve an A-rating category, they are unlikely to be downgraded, further highlighting the impact of these methodological decisions on the dynamics of ESG scoring. Overall, our analysis of three key sectors from 2012 to 2021 reveals that less than 45% of total absolute score variation is attributable to company disclosures, emphasizing the influence of score construction methodologies. We show that replacing percentile ranking with a simpler Performance Ratio methodology could mitigate these issues, offering more representative scores.
Keywords: ESG score; ESG rating methodology; Refinitiv; Normalization; Missingness (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C80 G24 M14 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521925003266
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:finana:v:104:y:2025:i:pa:s1057521925003266
DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104239
Access Statistics for this article
International Review of Financial Analysis is currently edited by B.M. Lucey
More articles in International Review of Financial Analysis from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().