An analysis of heterogeneous utility benchmarks in a zero return environment
Fred Viole and
David Nawrocki
International Review of Financial Analysis, 2013, vol. 28, issue C, 190-198
Abstract:
The utility of an investor should be based on an acceptable loss in the loss region and a target return in the gain region of a set of investment opportunities. The level of these benchmarks will unveil an opportunity cost, break-even effect, or indifference when the return of an investment equals zero. This condition has been arbitrarily assumed away for continuity and other simplification purposes over the past few decades. Historically, utility functions, Von Neumann–Morgenstern compliant and not, are constrained via a single target or reference point. This single target restriction coupled with the arbitrary zero-return assumption has ignored the important interpretation of this salient point on the utility curve as a proxy for the investor's current wealth. We propose a utility function using lower partial moments to describe the utility of losses and upper partial moments to describe the utility of gains.
Keywords: Expected utility theory; Prospect theory; Upper and lower partial moments; Allais' paradox (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521913000318
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:finana:v:28:y:2013:i:c:p:190-198
DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2013.02.014
Access Statistics for this article
International Review of Financial Analysis is currently edited by B.M. Lucey
More articles in International Review of Financial Analysis from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().