EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Backtesting VaR and ES under the magnifying glass

Christos Argyropoulos and Ekaterini Panopoulou ()

International Review of Financial Analysis, 2019, vol. 64, issue C, 22-37

Abstract: Backtesting provides the means of determining the accuracy of risk forecasts and the corresponding risk model. Given that the actual return generating process is unknown, the evaluation methods rely on various assumptions in order to quantify the models inefficiencies and proceed with the model evaluation. These method specific assumptions, in conjunction with the regulatory policies can introduce distortions in the evaluation process, which affect the reliability of the evaluation results. To investigate such effects from a practitioner's perspective, this paper reviews the major Value at Risk and Expected Shortfall forecast evaluation methods and evaluates their performance under a common simulation and financial application framework.

Keywords: Value-at-Risk; Expected Shortfall; Model accuracy; Backtesting; Forecast evaluation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521918305507
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:finana:v:64:y:2019:i:c:p:22-37

DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2019.04.005

Access Statistics for this article

International Review of Financial Analysis is currently edited by B.M. Lucey

More articles in International Review of Financial Analysis from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Haili He ().

 
Page updated 2020-08-26
Handle: RePEc:eee:finana:v:64:y:2019:i:c:p:22-37