Risk quantification for commodity ETFs: Backtesting value-at-risk and expected shortfall

Esther B. Del Brio, Andrés Mora-Valencia and Javier Perote

International Review of Financial Analysis, 2020, vol. 70, issue C

Abstract: This paper calibrates risk assessment of alternative methods for modeling commodity ETFs. We implement recently proposed backtesting techniques for both value-at-risk (VaR) and expected shortfall (ES) under parametric and semi-nonparametric techniques. Our results indicate that skewed-t and Gram-Charlier distributional assumptions present the best relative performance for individual Commodity ETFs for those confidence levels recommended by Basel Accords. In view of these results, we recommend the application of leptokurtic distributions and semi-nonparametric techniques to mitigate regulation concerns about global financial stability of commodity business.

Keywords: Value-at-risk; Expected shortfall; Backtesting; Gram-Charlier expansion (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C46 C58 G17 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (19)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521917301801
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:finana:v:70:y:2020:i:c:s1057521917301801

DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2017.11.007

Access Statistics for this article

International Review of Financial Analysis is currently edited by B.M. Lucey

More articles in International Review of Financial Analysis from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().