Risk quantification for commodity ETFs: Backtesting value-at-risk and expected shortfall
Esther B. Del Brio,
Andrés Mora-Valencia and
Javier Perote ()
International Review of Financial Analysis, 2020, vol. 70, issue C
This paper calibrates risk assessment of alternative methods for modeling commodity ETFs. We implement recently proposed backtesting techniques for both value-at-risk (VaR) and expected shortfall (ES) under parametric and semi-nonparametric techniques. Our results indicate that skewed-t and Gram-Charlier distributional assumptions present the best relative performance for individual Commodity ETFs for those confidence levels recommended by Basel Accords. In view of these results, we recommend the application of leptokurtic distributions and semi-nonparametric techniques to mitigate regulation concerns about global financial stability of commodity business.
Keywords: Value-at-risk; Expected shortfall; Backtesting; Gram-Charlier expansion (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C46 C58 G17 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:finana:v:70:y:2020:i:c:s1057521917301801
Access Statistics for this article
International Review of Financial Analysis is currently edited by B.M. Lucey
More articles in International Review of Financial Analysis from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Haili He ().