Machine-learning stock market volatility: Predictability, drivers, and economic value

Juan D. Díaz, Erwin Hansen and Gabriel Cabrera

International Review of Financial Analysis, 2024, vol. 94, issue C

Abstract: We investigate whether machine learning (ML) techniques, using a large set of financial and macroeconomic variables, help to predict S&P 500 realized volatility and deliver economic value. We evaluate regularization methods (Ridge, Lasso, and Elastic Net), tree-based methods (Random Forest and Gradient boosting), and Neural Networks. We find that ML algorithms outperform the benchmark model (HAR) at a short horizon (1 month), but not over longer periods (6 and 12 months). Regularization methods and Neural Networks emerge as the most competitive ML methods. We find that the quality of predictors is crucial, with financial and macroeconomic uncertainty proxies playing the most significant role. From an economic perspective, however, predictive ML models do not yield substantial gains compared to the benchmark.

Keywords: Realized volatility; Machine learning; Forecasting; Technical indicators; Neural networks (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G10 G11 G15 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521924002187
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:finana:v:94:y:2024:i:c:s1057521924002187

DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103286

Access Statistics for this article

International Review of Financial Analysis is currently edited by B.M. Lucey

More articles in International Review of Financial Analysis from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().