Non-response bias in expectation surveys: Different perceptions and expectations of financial matters from “early quitters”
Ruichen Huang
Finance Research Letters, 2025, vol. 82, issue C
Abstract:
This study demonstrates that non-response bias drives selective sample attrition in expectation surveys that require consecutive household responses. Examining 160,842 responses from 20,963 respondents in the Survey of Consumer Expectations (SCE) from June 2013 to April 2024, I show that 66.1 % of respondents who quit the consecutive survey before the completion of 12 tenures—the early quitters—only contributed 44.6 % of total responses. On average, they are 3.2 years younger, have a 5.14 % higher proportion of females, and exhibit lower numerical ability and education level than other respondents. I construct a regression model to demonstrate that early quitters possess significantly different perceptions and expectations regarding personal, household, and national financial and economic matters when responding to SCE. Notably, the early quitters have more positive expectations regarding changes in their financial situation for the next year. They exhibit more negative perceptions of changes in loan difficulty in the U.S. over the past year and hold more pessimistic expectations for changes in loan difficulty in the U.S. for the next year. They anticipate a higher probability of an increased unemployment rate in the U.S. for the next year. All the above results are irrespective of whether the regressions are unweighted or weighted. The non-response bias renders the survey data ungeneralizable, and the weighting applied by SCE does not solve this bias.
Keywords: Household expectation; Non-response bias; Financial literacy; Financial situation; Loan difficulty; Survey weight (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C83 D84 G40 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544612325008839
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:finlet:v:82:y:2025:i:c:s1544612325008839
DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2025.107624
Access Statistics for this article
Finance Research Letters is currently edited by R. Gençay
More articles in Finance Research Letters from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().