Wealth dynamics and a bias toward momentum trading
Blake Lebaron ()
Finance Research Letters, 2012, vol. 9, issue 1, 21-28
Abstract:
Evolutionary metaphors have been prominent in both economics and finance. They are often used as basic foundations for rational behavior and efficient markets. Theoretically, a mechanism which selects for rational investors requires many caveats, and is far from generic. This paper tests wealth based evolution in a simple, stylized agent-based financial market. The setup borrows extensively from current research in finance that considers optimal behavior with some amount of return predictability. In the case of utility functions which differ from log, wealth selection alone converges to parameters which are economically far from the optimal forecast parameters. This serves as a strong reminder that wealth selection and utility maximization are not the same thing. Therefore, suboptimal financial forecasting strategies may be difficult to drive out of a market, and may even do quite well for some time.
Keywords: Evolution; Asset pricing; Financial time series; Momentum (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D83 G12 G14 G17 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544612311000420
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
Working Paper: Wealth Dynamics and a Bias Toward Momentum Trading (2010) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:finlet:v:9:y:2012:i:1:p:21-28
DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2011.09.001
Access Statistics for this article
Finance Research Letters is currently edited by R. Gençay
More articles in Finance Research Letters from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().