Too much of a good thing? Speculative effects on commodity futures curves

Sophie van Huellen

Journal of Financial Markets, 2020, vol. 47, issue C

Abstract: The increasing inflow of index traders into commodity futures markets has been linked to anomalies in futures curves. At the same time, these investors have been welcomed as liquidity providers. In this paper, I reconcile the apparent dissent. Using factor decomposition, I show (a) that index and hedging positions have offsetting effects on futures curves, and (b) index positions are associated with upward sloping, peaked futures curves, and occasionally wave-like shapes linked to roll effects. These findings suggest that index traders are liquidity providers but can become too much of a good thing if exceeding hedgers' demand for a counterparty.

Keywords: Financialization; Futures curve; Speculation; Soft commodities; Term structure (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G13 G14 Q02 Q14 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386418118302295
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
Working Paper: Too Much of a Good Thing? Speculative Effects on Commodity Futures Curves (2018)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:finmar:v:47:y:2020:i:c:s1386418118302295

DOI: 10.1016/j.finmar.2018.12.001

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Financial Markets is currently edited by B. Lehmann, D. Seppi and A. Subrahmanyam

More articles in Journal of Financial Markets from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().