Journal of Financial Markets, 2021, vol. 55, issue C
The recent LIBOR and ISDAfix manipulation scandals have inspired discussions about survey-based financial benchmarks. I investigate surveys as the statistical inference problem plagued by the principal-agent frictions between benchmark administrators and banks. Without knowing the distribution of private signals, an administrator can implement a sufficient expected quadratic penalty through random audits and post-audit fines to minimize reporting errors and induce a distribution-free expected benchmark bias. Sufficiently frequent random audits that discipline the bank with maximum borrowing cost can mitigate the impact of constraints on post-audit fines. Finally, delaying the release of bank reports may not be effective in fighting collusion.
Keywords: LIBOR; Principal-agent problem; Statistical inference; Mechanism design; Benchmarking (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D43 D44 D47 G10 G21 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:finmar:v:55:y:2021:i:c:s1386418120300550
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Financial Markets is currently edited by B. Lehmann, D. Seppi and A. Subrahmanyam
More articles in Journal of Financial Markets from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().