Evaluating measures of adverse financial conditions
Mikhail V. Oet,
Dieter Gramlich and
Journal of Financial Stability, 2016, vol. 27, issue C, 234-249
Timely identification and anticipation of adverse conditions in the financial system are critical for macroprudential policy. However, there is no consensus on how to evaluate the quality of systemic measures. This paper provides a framework to compare measures of systemic conditions. We illustrate the proposed tests with a case study of US measures from 1976 to 2013. We find that measures which include information from multiple markets improve identification of critical system states. However, tested measures show limited capacity to anticipate critical episodes.
Keywords: Measures of systemic conditions; Evaluation of information quality; Signal extraction approach; Pervasiveness; Persistence; Severity; Noise-to-signal ratio; Relative usefulness; Information value (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G01 G18 E32 E37 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:finsta:v:27:y:2016:i:c:p:234-249
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Financial Stability is currently edited by I. Hasan, W. C. Hunter and G. G. Kaufman
More articles in Journal of Financial Stability from Elsevier
Series data maintained by Dana Niculescu ().