Forestry professionalism overrides gender: A case study of nature perception in Germany

Sabine Storch

Forest Policy and Economics, 2011, vol. 13, issue 3, 171-175

Abstract: Are women in the public forest services potential agents for change, as some authors have suggested? In this article, I hypothesise that professionalism conditions nature perception and overrides gender effects among foresters. Professionalism here includes expertise and exercise of control. Cultural Theory, especially the four 'nature myths' that have been adapted to it, ground the study theoretically, and data from two surveys ground the study empirically (survey of the German population (Kuckartz et al. 2006) and my own survey of German state foresters (2008)). The empirical findings support the hypothesis. Differences between foresters and the general public are bigger than between female and male foresters. Foresters, whether male or female, perceive nature as less ephemeral and less capricious than does the general public. Besides, they have a distinct cultural bias towards nature as tolerant but vulnerable to surpassing ultimate limits. Female foresters therefore do not change the profession's nature perception, at least not because of their gender. Questions that remain are: why does the percentage of women in forestry nevertheless remain low and how could change happen then?

Keywords: Nature; perception; Cultural; Theory; Forestry; professionalism; Gender; Germany (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389-9341(10)00150-4
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:forpol:v:13:y:2011:i:3:p:171-175

Access Statistics for this article

Forest Policy and Economics is currently edited by M. Krott

More articles in Forest Policy and Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().