EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Have protected areas in China achieved the ecological and economic “win-win” goals? Evidence from the Giant Panda Reserves of the Min Mont Range

Yi Li and Zhenjiang Song

Forest Policy and Economics, 2022, vol. 144, issue C

Abstract: Evaluating the effectiveness of conservation policies is a primary means in support of continued expansion and improved management of protected areas (PAs) for wildlife. This study assesses the ecological and economic effectiveness of giant panda PAs in the Mont Min Range of southwest China, by taking advantage of the cutting-edge impact evaluation methods and a large panel dataset derived from remote sensing images, GIS data, and socioeconomic statistics. Our results show that the most prominent effects are the increase in giant panda activities, the improvement of forest cover, the development of ecotourism and environmentally friendly agriculture, and the growth of farmer income. Also, the PAs have not caused ecological damage and poverty to undesignated areas outside of them. Meanwhile, they have not enhanced the growth of bamboo resources nor mitigated the threat of intense human pressures. Overall, the PAs have thus achieved a “win-win” outcome. Our study contributes to improved understanding and action of wildlife conservation not only for China but also for many other parts of the world.

Keywords: Conservation policy; Protected area; Giant panda habitat; Effectiveness evaluation; “Ecological-economic” win-win (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934122001587
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:forpol:v:144:y:2022:i:c:s1389934122001587

DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2022.102845

Access Statistics for this article

Forest Policy and Economics is currently edited by M. Krott

More articles in Forest Policy and Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:144:y:2022:i:c:s1389934122001587