The discount rate differential required for harvesting-by-dice-rolling to outperform optimal rotation planning

John D. Foppert

Forest Policy and Economics, 2024, vol. 160, issue C

Abstract: Although the cost of capital has enormous bearing on the financial performance of forestry investment projects, the dynamics of this factor of production are under-theorized in modern forest economic thought and its potential susceptibility to management is under-analyzed by forest managers, investors, and scholars. This study illustrates the importance of the cost of capital relative to the choice of rotation age by modeling the discount rate differential required for fully randomized harvesting strategies to yield the same expected capitalized returns as optimal rotation planning. For numerical simulations of radiata pine plantations in New Zealand and benchmark discount rates between 1% and 10%, a crude dice-rolling strategy required discount rate concessions from 0.31 to 3.35 percentage points to match the performance of optimal rotations. “Optimal” random harvesting strategies—with stochastic harvest probabilities specified to maximize expected value—required discount rate concessions lower than one percentage point across the entire range of benchmark rates. This paper concludes with an exploration of potential mechanisms through which the cost of capital could be endogenized in forest economic analysis and practical investment management.

Keywords: Timberland investment; Discount rates; Optimal rotations; Asset pricing (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934124000078
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:forpol:v:160:y:2024:i:c:s1389934124000078

DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103154

Access Statistics for this article

Forest Policy and Economics is currently edited by M. Krott

More articles in Forest Policy and Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().