Agricultural subsidies augmented tropical deforestation in the state of Campeche, Mexico

Edward A. Ellis, David Chacón Castillo, Irving Uriel Hernández Gómez, Sergio Madrid Zubirán and Sara María Cuervo Vega

Forest Policy and Economics, 2025, vol. 177, issue C

Abstract: Stopping tropical deforestation is required to achieve climate change adaptation, conserve biodiversity and preserve forest livelihoods and cultures across the globe. We evaluate the causal impact of crop and livestock production subsidies (PROCAMPO and PROGAN) on deforestation in the state of Campeche, Mexico, with the highest national rate of forest cover loss. A quasi-experimental design was applied using covariate matching methods, specifically Mahalanobis distance matching, to evaluate the average treatment effect on the treated (ATT) on deforestation between subsidized (treated) and unsubsidized (control) community-based land production territories (ejidos), while controlling for relevant geographical and socioeconomic covariates characterizing the ejidos and representing the main regional deforestation drivers. Sensitivity analyses were conducted applying the Rosenbaum test and using alternative matching estimators to assess the robustness of the statistical comparisons. ATT results estimate that PROCAMPO augmented deforestation in subsidized ejidos by a mean of 165 ha between 2004 and 2018 and PROGAN by a mean of 334 ha between 2011 and 2018. Sensitivity analyses confirmed these programs may have had a significant and positive effect on deforestation. Up to 30 % of tropical forest loss in Campeche during the study period may be attributed to these subsidies. To achieve national and state level forest conservation outcomes, effective enrollment, assistance and monitoring procedures need to be in place, ensuring that enrolled land uses are not converted forest land. Moreover, integrating past forestry programs, such as payments for environmental services (PES) and community forest management (CFM), could help halt deforestation.

Keywords: Agricultural subsidies; Deforestation; Southeast Mexico; Mahalonobis distance matching; Public policy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934125001042
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:forpol:v:177:y:2025:i:c:s1389934125001042

DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103525

Access Statistics for this article

Forest Policy and Economics is currently edited by M. Krott

More articles in Forest Policy and Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().